|
|
|
|
Read the following passage and choose the answers to the questions from 3 to 5
for the given options.
Rational knowledge is derived from the experience we have with objects and
events in our everyday environment. It belongs to the realm of the intellect
whose function is to discriminate, divide, compare, measure and categorize. In
this way, a world of intellectual distinctions is created; of opposites which
can only exist in relation to each other, which is why Buddhists call this type
of knowledge ‘relative’.
Abstraction is a crucial feature of this knowledge, because in order to compare
and to classify the immense variety of shapes, structures and phenomena around
us we cannot take all their features into account, but have to select a few
significant ones. Thus we construct an intellectual map of reality in which
things are reduced to their general outlines. Rational knowledge is thus a
system of abstract concepts and symbols, characterized by the linear,
sequential structure which is typical of our thinking and speaking. In most
languages this linear structure is made explicit by the use of alphabets which
serve to communicate experience and thought in long lines of letters.
The natural world, on the other hand, is one of infinite varieties and
complexities, a multidimensional world which contains no straight lines or
completely regular shapes, where things do not happen in sequences, but
together; a world where, as modern physics tells us, even empty space is
curved. It is clear that our abstract system of conceptual thinking cannot
describe or understand this reality completely. In thinking about the world we
are faced with the same kind of problem as the cartographer who tries to cover
the curved face of the earth with a sequence of plane maps. We can only expect
an approximate representation of reality from such a procedure, and all
rational knowledge is therefore necessarily limited.
The realm of rational knowledge is, of course, the realm of science which
measures and quantifies, classifies and analyses. The limitations of any
knowledge obtained by these methods have become increasingly apparent in modern
science, and in particular in modern physics which has taught us, in the words
of Werner Heisenberg, “that every word or concept, clear as it may seem to be,
has only a limited range of applicability”.
For most of us it is very difficult to be constantly aware of the limitations
and of the relativity of conceptual knowledge. Because our representation of
reality is so much easier to grasp than reality itself, we tend to confuse the
two and to take our concepts and symbols for reality. It is one of the main
aims of Eastern mysticism to rid us of this confusion. Zen Buddhists say that a
finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble ourselves
with the finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble
ourselves with the finger once the moon is recognized; the Taoist sage Chuang
Tzu wrote:
Fishing baskets are employed to catch fish; but when the fish are got, the men
forgot baskets; snares are employed to catch hares; but when hares are got, men
forgot the snares. Words are employed to convey ideas; but when the ideas are
grasped, men forgot the words.
In the West, the semanticist Alfred Korzybski made exactly the same point with
his powerful slogan, “the map is not the territory.”
Fritjof Capra, The Tao of Physics (1975)
|
Read the following passage and choose the answers to the questions from 3 to 5
for the given options.
Rational knowledge is derived from the experience we have with objects and
events in our everyday environment. It belongs to the realm of the intellect
whose function is to discriminate, divide, compare, measure and categorize. In
this way, a world of intellectual distinctions is created; of opposites which
can only exist in relation to each other, which is why Buddhists call this type
of knowledge ‘relative’.
Abstraction is a crucial feature of this knowledge, because in order to compare
and to classify the immense variety of shapes, structures and phenomena around
us we cannot take all their features into account, but have to select a few
significant ones. Thus we construct an intellectual map of reality in which
things are reduced to their general outlines. Rational knowledge is thus a
system of abstract concepts and symbols, characterized by the linear,
sequential structure which is typical of our thinking and speaking. In most
languages this linear structure is made explicit by the use of alphabets which
serve to communicate experience and thought in long lines of letters.
The natural world, on the other hand, is one of infinite varieties and
complexities, a multidimensional world which contains no straight lines or
completely regular shapes, where things do not happen in sequences, but
together; a world where, as modern physics tells us, even empty space is
curved. It is clear that our abstract system of conceptual thinking cannot
describe or understand this reality completely. In thinking about the world we
are faced with the same kind of problem as the cartographer who tries to cover
the curved face of the earth with a sequence of plane maps. We can only expect
an approximate representation of reality from such a procedure, and all
rational knowledge is therefore necessarily limited.
The realm of rational knowledge is, of course, the realm of science which
measures and quantifies, classifies and analyses. The limitations of any
knowledge obtained by these methods have become increasingly apparent in modern
science, and in particular in modern physics which has taught us, in the words
of Werner Heisenberg, “that every word or concept, clear as it may seem to be,
has only a limited range of applicability”.
For most of us it is very difficult to be constantly aware of the limitations
and of the relativity of conceptual knowledge. Because our representation of
reality is so much easier to grasp than reality itself, we tend to confuse the
two and to take our concepts and symbols for reality. It is one of the main
aims of Eastern mysticism to rid us of this confusion. Zen Buddhists say that a
finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble ourselves
with the finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble
ourselves with the finger once the moon is recognized; the Taoist sage Chuang
Tzu wrote:
Fishing baskets are employed to catch fish; but when the fish are got, the men
forgot baskets; snares are employed to catch hares; but when hares are got, men
forgot the snares. Words are employed to convey ideas; but when the ideas are
grasped, men forgot the words.
In the West, the semanticist Alfred Korzybski made exactly the same point with
his powerful slogan, “the map is not the territory.”
Fritjof Capra, The Tao of Physics (1975)
|
Read the following passage and choose the answers to the questions from 3 to 5
for the given options.
Rational knowledge is derived from the experience we have with objects and
events in our everyday environment. It belongs to the realm of the intellect
whose function is to discriminate, divide, compare, measure and categorize. In
this way, a world of intellectual distinctions is created; of opposites which
can only exist in relation to each other, which is why Buddhists call this type
of knowledge ‘relative’.
Abstraction is a crucial feature of this knowledge, because in order to compare
and to classify the immense variety of shapes, structures and phenomena around
us we cannot take all their features into account, but have to select a few
significant ones. Thus we construct an intellectual map of reality in which
things are reduced to their general outlines. Rational knowledge is thus a
system of abstract concepts and symbols, characterized by the linear,
sequential structure which is typical of our thinking and speaking. In most
languages this linear structure is made explicit by the use of alphabets which
serve to communicate experience and thought in long lines of letters.
The natural world, on the other hand, is one of infinite varieties and
complexities, a multidimensional world which contains no straight lines or
completely regular shapes, where things do not happen in sequences, but
together; a world where, as modern physics tells us, even empty space is
curved. It is clear that our abstract system of conceptual thinking cannot
describe or understand this reality completely. In thinking about the world we
are faced with the same kind of problem as the cartographer who tries to cover
the curved face of the earth with a sequence of plane maps. We can only expect
an approximate representation of reality from such a procedure, and all
rational knowledge is therefore necessarily limited.
The realm of rational knowledge is, of course, the realm of science which
measures and quantifies, classifies and analyses. The limitations of any
knowledge obtained by these methods have become increasingly apparent in modern
science, and in particular in modern physics which has taught us, in the words
of Werner Heisenberg, “that every word or concept, clear as it may seem to be,
has only a limited range of applicability”.
For most of us it is very difficult to be constantly aware of the limitations
and of the relativity of conceptual knowledge. Because our representation of
reality is so much easier to grasp than reality itself, we tend to confuse the
two and to take our concepts and symbols for reality. It is one of the main
aims of Eastern mysticism to rid us of this confusion. Zen Buddhists say that a
finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble ourselves
with the finger is needed to point at the moon, but that we should not trouble
ourselves with the finger once the moon is recognized; the Taoist sage Chuang
Tzu wrote:
Fishing baskets are employed to catch fish; but when the fish are got, the men
forgot baskets; snares are employed to catch hares; but when hares are got, men
forgot the snares. Words are employed to convey ideas; but when the ideas are
grasped, men forgot the words.
In the West, the semanticist Alfred Korzybski made exactly the same point with
his powerful slogan, “the map is not the territory.”
Fritjof Capra, The Tao of Physics (1975)
|
Questions 4 and 5 are based on the following :
Percentage of Sales of Biscuits India Limited (BIL) by flavour/ variety
| Flavour/ Variety |
Year 2006 |
Year 2007 |
| Milk Biscuits |
9 |
10 |
| Glucose |
45 |
45 |
| Marieq |
25 |
26 |
| Chocolate |
15 |
16 |
| Salt Biscuits |
6 |
3 |
The sales of BIL in 2006 is Rs.1100 crore. From 2006 to 2007, the sales grew by
15%.
|
Questions 4 and 5 are based on the following :
Percentage of Sales of Biscuits India Limited (BIL) by flavour/ variety
| Flavour/ Variety |
Year 2006 |
Year 2007 |
| Milk Biscuits |
9 |
10 |
| Glucose |
45 |
45 |
| Marie |
25 |
26 |
| Chocolate |
15 |
16 |
| Salt Biscuits |
6 |
3 |
The sales of BIL in 2006 is Rs.1100 crore. From 2006 to 2007, the sales grew by
15%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|